It is now in about six weeks ago that Google has launched boutiques.com . Something unusual, right? I thought I also look at erst.
precise location I get at least a slightly better idea of what Google may be planning here.
Well, it is essentially about that you can on the Internet "similar" products now very good, because the net just that prevails comparability. So if a TV, buy a digicam or other would-oriented, usually at well-defined product features, is the emotional shopping experience rather rare. Unless you're a freak. :)
clothes or shoes at all already looks different. fashion would be touched feel like the new pair of jeans feels to get a feel for how the new shirt is an accessory or whether A passes to B outfit. And just here trying boutiques.com to tie.
far, so good. Formerly owned the team to boutiques.com like.com, and had developed as a key feature a "visual search engine technology . Say: Shop offers are sorted by visual criteria, cross-comparisons are possible. The whole thing looks in live use this: not
already bad. Very impressive.
Furthermore can at boutiques.com also normal shopping (listed stores pay for it - of course), you can inspired by celebrities and their Boutiques (currently trending: Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen, Nicole Richie, or - God forbid - Kelly Osbourne. Those who want to imitate their style is right here), his own "boutique" show create & thus the world what fashion taste you have.
What I like: the visual search is great, otherwise there are some nice features like the selection by style, color or product type (see right). You can refine his "style" by individual can products according to various criteria 
love or haten . Well, yes. So far nothing special. Although one can liken individual styles, etc. but not even notify individual products on Facebook. Today should really be standard. Who are some functions a bit like to read more, eg at Michaela of tschilp.com will find .
I think for my part not think "shopping way as fashion" boutiques.com the change is how Google sees it. Sure, some features are quite nice, but Google's was probably more concerned with the visual search technology.
0 comments:
Post a Comment